Abstract Objective: To present scientific evidence, based on a systematic review of the literature, on the benefit of brainstem implants in auditory rehabilitation and language development in children. Methods: A systematic search was used to identify studies that contain information about the benefit of brainstem implants in the auditory rehabilitation and language development of children. The review was conducted based on a structured literature search, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist. The search was carried out in the PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases, using the combination “Auditory brainstem implants” AND “Pediatric”, without restriction of language, period, and location. The quality assessment of the articles was performed using the Study Quality Assessment Tools. Results: Regarding hearing, children with brainstem implants showed sound detection, access to most speech sounds, basic auditory perception skills, recognition of ambient sounds, recognition of some frequently used words and phrases, in addition to some closed-set word discrimination capability. Expressive and comprehensive language were identified in children using auditory brainstem implants, increasing significantly in the short and long terms in most cases; however, in some of the children, such skills remained stable. Conclusion: The auditory brainstem implant can be considered an effective alternative for children with cochlear malformation and/or auditory nerve deficiency and for those who cannot benefit from cochlear implant surgery.

RESUMO Objetivo Pesquisar a habilidade auditiva de atenção seletiva na população escolar e identificar valores de referência para a faixa etária de sete a dez anos por meio do teste Masking Level Difference, além de identificar se a escolaridade dos pais, bem como a renda familiar, pode influenciar os resultados do teste. Método Participaram do estudo 31 escolares que se encaixaram nos critérios de elegibilidade da pesquisa, sendo 20 do gênero feminino e 11 do gênero masculino. Realizou-se anamnese para questionamento da renda familiar e escolaridade dos pais do escolar, inspeção visual do meato acústico externo, audiometria tonal liminar, logoaudiometria, medidas de imitância acústica, teste Dicótico de Dígitos e teste Masking Level Difference. Resultados A idade média dos indivíduos foi de 8,67 anos. Não foi observada diferença entre os gêneros e entre as idades avaliadas, no desempenho do MLD. Não houve relação entre a escolaridade dos pais e a renda mensal média com o desempenho das crianças no MLD. A média do MLD foi de 7,65 dB, com desvio padrão de 2,51 dB. Conclusão O Masking Level Difference em escolares de sete a dez anos é de 7,65 dB e independe do gênero, do nível de escolaridade dos pais ou da renda mensal média da família do escolar.

ABSTRACT Purpose To investigate the auditory ability of selective attention in the school population and to identify reference values to the age group from seven to ten years old through the Masking Level Difference Test, and to identify if the parents’ schooling, as well as the family income can influence the test results. Methods Thirty-one schoolchildren who match the eligibility criteria attended the study, being 20 female and 11 male. An anamnesis was conducted to question the familiar income and the schooling of the children´s parents; we also performed visual inspection of the External Acoustic Meatus, Pure Tone Audiometry, Speech Audiometry, Acoustic Immittance Measures, Dichotic Digits Test and Masking Level Difference test. Results The mean age of the individuals was 8.67 years. There were no observed differences between genders and between the evaluated ages in the MLD performance. There was no relation between the parents’ schooling and the average monthly income with the performance of the children in MLD Test. The MLD mean was 7.65 dB and standard deviation of 2.51 dB. Conclusion The Masking Level Difference in schoolchildren from seven to ten years old is 7.65 dB and is independent of the gender, parents’ schooling and the average monthly income of the schoolchild.

RESUMO Objetivo: detectar a sensibilidade, para avaliar a habilidade de resolução temporal, comparando os testes Randon Gap Detection Test (RGDT) e Gaps- In-Noise (GIN) além de sugerir valores de referência nestes testes para idosos. Métodos: participaram 38 idosos, 24 mulheres e 14 homens, com idades entre 60 e 82 anos, com audição normal ou perda auditiva neurossensorial até moderada; com simetria entre as orelhas; timpanograma tipo A, reflexos acústicos presentes, com queixa de processamento auditivo. Todos Foram submetidos a avaliação básica para caracterizar a audição periférica, RGDT e GIN. Resultados: a sensibilidade encontrada para o teste RGDT na identificação da habilidade de resolução temporal foi de 88,64% e no GIN de 67,65%. Os valores médios para o limiar de detecção de gap no teste GIN encontraram-se em torno de 8ms e para o teste RGDT em 23,13ms. Conclusão: o teste RGDT demonstrou maior sensibilidade para detecção da alteração da habilidade de resolução temporal. Os valores dos limiares de resolução temporal, sugeridos como valores de referência para idosos, são de 8ms para o GIN e 23,13 ms para o RGDT.

ABSTRACT Purpose: detecting the sensitivity to evaluate the temporal resolution ability, by comparing Randon Gap Detection Test (RGDT) and Gaps- In-Noise (GIN) tests, in addition to suggesting reference values in these tests for elderly people. Methods: 38 elderly people, 24 women and 14 men, aged between 60 and 82 years, with normal hearing or sensorineural to moderate hearing loss; with symmetry between the ears; Type A tympanogram, acoustic reflex, with auditory processing complaints. All patients underwent basic evaluations to characterize the peripheral hearing - RGDT and GIN. Results: the sensitivity found for RGDT regarding the identification of the temporal resolution ability was 88.64% and 67.65% in GIN. The mean values for the gap detection thresholds in GIN test were around 8ms and for the RGDT test in 23,13ms. Conclusion: RGDT test presented greater sensitivity for detecting the change in temporal resolution ability. The values of temporal resolution thresholds suggested as reference values for the elderly people, are 8ms for GIN and 23.13 ms for RGDT.